Summary of Comments on Moro Massacre by Mark Twain Essay

Summery of Comments of Moro Massacre by Mark twain. On March 12th nineteen hundred and six (1906) Mark Twain, celebrated american writer made a work called comments of the Moro massacre. This work concerned the engagement of five hundred and forty (540) U.S Army men with auxiliaries and the Moro of the Philippines which where six hundred in number. The man leading the U.S armed force Major General Leonard Wood and the U.S soldiers were armed with the latest assault rifles and small fire arms of their time, and artillery. The moro were villagers with clubs and other bludgeoning devices, machetes and crude muskets. The battle occurred in a crater. The moro were situated in the crater and american forces attacking, and†¦show more content†¦Mark Twain who was known to be familiar to presidents says that the president didn’t not speak from the heart and says there is nothing fantastic about killing men women and children from a safe place with artillery and modern weapons of warfare. News that confirms children were indeed involved is brought to america. Mark Twain calls it â€Å"splendid news† sarcastically. Mark Twain then says that there are emotions that surface with the mention of the word children. Despite that they are savages the children in any society represent the innocent and uncorrupted therefore they should not be subject to punishment. The Moro rebellion was an of shoot of the Philippine-American war. The american armed forces had defeated the spanish in the naval Battle of Manila Bay. The spanish ceded the Philippines to the United States but never had control of the moro who lived in the Mindanao and surrounding islands. The U.s land about elven thousand troops and wanted to take the place of the spanish as colonial masters which brought about the phillipine-american war. During the war the main influence on the views of americans was the poem called â€Å"The White Man’s Burden† by Rudyard Kipling. Kip ling who was british but influenced americans by the latter taking his poem as a justification for imperialism. The poem also refers to non whites as â€Å"half devil and half child.†

Analysis Of Barbara Corcoran s The Shark Tank Essay

For my philanthropy paper I selected Barbara Corcoran. I choose to write about her because she inspired me with her story from watching ABC’s Shark Tank. Barbara started from the bottom in high school and did not do well but became a successful millionaire. But she is a businesswoman, investor, speaker, consultant, syndicated columnist, author and â€Å"A Shark† meaning an investor on ABC’s Show Shark Tank. Though out this paper I am going to focus on her background, history, major accomplishments, contributions and lastly some of her personal experiences. Barbara was born on March 10, 1949 in in Teaneck New Jersey, and grew up in Edgewater, New Jersey and is an Irish descent (Cite-wiki). She currently lives in Manhattan, New York. She did go to college even though she did not do well in high school, she still attended St. Thomas Aquinas College. For her occupation she is the Founder of The Corcoran Group, Barbara Corcoran Inc. and Barbara Corcoran Venture Partners and is worth $80 million dollars. Barbara is married to Bill Higgins and has two children boy and a girl. (cite-wiki) Barbara was married twice Bill is her second Husband. Post graduation in 1971 from St. Thomas Aquinas College with a degree in education. She tried teaching for roughly a year but did not think that it was her niche. So than later on while in New York she decided to work a wide spread of jobs, one including renting out apartments in New York City. Barbara got straight D’s in high school and

Legal Abortion free essay sample

The topic of abortion is one of the most controversial of our times. It has caused countless deaths and several violent confrontations between the two separate parties of opinion. The fight between pro-life and pro-choice supporters has been long and brutal. This is because, despite what several people may believe, abortion is neither right nor wrong. It is a matter of personal opinion. In this way, each side can say with certainty that the other is wrong. However, the question still remains; should abortion be legal? Though some may disagree on this point, the fact is that legalized abortion is the only option that will protect the lives of American citizens. Therefore, present abortion laws according to Roe v. Wade should be upheld and maintained in the United States (Brown 2). Roe v. Wade was a landmark decision that legalized abortions in the United States. It was about a poor, pregnant woman who filed a lawsuit against the state law of Texas, which stated that abortions were illegal. The case went all the way to the U. S. Supreme Court, which meant that the decision made affected the nation as a whole. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jane Roe and stated that the 14th amendment guarantees an adult woman the right to seek a termination of her pregnancy until viability (Guernsey 63). From this day on, abortions in the United States were legal. The definitions of the opinions taken on abortion are somewhat unclear to many people. Hopefully, the definitions stated below will be of some help in choosing an opinion. Pro-life supporters believe that a fetuss right to live comes first, before the rights of a pregnant woman. Pro-choice supporters believe that it is a womans fundamental human right to decide when and whether or not to have the child (Lowenstein19). Nevertheless, while the pro-choice side fights the right to have an abortion, they make a distinction between pro-choice and pro-abortion, These groups want women to be able to choose an abortion if it is right for them. However, they do not necessarily believe abortion is the solution for everyone (Lowenstein 52). There are many reasons why abortion should be legal. The single most important effect of legalization has been the substitution of safe, legal procedures for abortions that formerly were obtained illegally ( Jaffe, Lindheim, and Lee 147). One only needs to look into American history to see the results of prohibiting abortions to women. The violence which occurs today because of the pro-choice/pro-life conflicts is minimal in comparison to the thousands of hopeless women who turned to illegal abortions. Women, seeing no other solution to their problems, turned to back room clinics. These clinics were located in poverty-ridden sections of the city and their conditions were deplorable. The places themselves were layered in filth and disease. Inexperienced butchers using dirty and crude equipment treated the women. As if these backroom clinics were not bad enough, there was an even more appalling decision a woman might face. If she were unable to pay the exorbitant price for the illegal surgery, she would often perform the act herself. Knitting needles, coat hangers, antiseptic douches, and poisons were used most often (Welton123). It is better now that women have a place to go where abortions can be performed cleanly with minimal risk. Legalization of abortion is the only choice no matter what side on takes in the debate. Women will try to do what they think is necessary to live as they wish, no matter what the risk. Each year 84,000 women die worldwide from failed abortion attempts (Lunneborg67) . Because of anti-abortion legislation, women avoid going to the hospital, often until it is too late, to avoid prosecution from police. In the cases of rape and incest, the very idea of being forced to have the child of the womans abuser is repulsive. There are also cases when a womans health is put in jeopardy by having a child at all. Forcing a woman to bring the child to term would be no less than attempted murder (Steffen 49). If a woman is forced to give birth to a child she does not want, if left in that womans custody, the child could potentially face hatred and resentment from the mother for the rest of its life. In countries all over the world, children are found dead and abandoned in places as degrading as garbage dumps. The only effective method of preventing unwanted births is abstinence, and this is just not a realistic objective. There is no 100% effective form of birth control, and even men and women using birth control have unwanted pregnancies. Some women for financial, occupational, social, and maturity reasons, see pregnancy as cessation of their lives. There are no accurate statistics on how many women attempt or succeed in committing suicide each year rather than live with their pregnancies. Women will continue to gave abortions with or without government legislation, but with legislation, the conditions under which they have their abortions can be sanctioned and observed. If abortion is the right choice for a woman, she shouldnt have to worry about its safety. The procedure is perfectly safe. The earlier an abortion is done, the safer it is. Most abortions, about 95%, are done during the first trimester (Lowenstein 52). Less than one percent are done after the twentieth week, and usually only for medical reasons (Safety 1). According to the National Abortion Federation, having an abortion in the first three months of pregnancy is safer than giving birth to a child. Women hardly ever die from legal abortions-only one in two hundred thousand (Lowenstein 52). Women are seven times likely to die from childbirth than from a legal abortion (Maguire 1). Many pro-life supporters believe that abortion should be banned because life begins at conception and taking a life is unlawful. The individual sex cell consists of 23 chromosomes. It is only through combination, through merger, that the sex cells attain the full complement of heredity units that defines a human being (Shettles 17). The merger of the two sex cells is complete within twelve hours, at which time the egg is fertilized and becomes known technically as the zygote. The inherited characteristics of a unique human being has been established, and in no circumstances will it change (Shettles 17). At eighteen days, the heart is pumping through a closed circulatory system, with blood whose type is different from that of the mothers. The brain starts working at forty days. and all of the fetuss body systems are in place by the time it is two months old (Every child 1). Pro-lifers believe this evidence shows a fetus is alive. For these reasons, they feel the fetus has a soul and is a person worthy of respect. They conclude that aborting a fetus is the same as murdering a person (Abortion 3). Most pro-choice supporters agree that taking a human life is unlawful, however, they argue that unborn fetuses do not constitute fully developed human life. The possession of forty-six chromosomes does not make a cell a person. Most of the cells in a persons body contain these 46 chromosomes, but that does not make a white corpuscle a person. As for the significance of uniqueness, identical quintuplets are genetically identical, yet they have personal identities apart from their genetic endowment. Even though a fetus might have a heartbeat and brain waves, this does not make a fetus a person. To be a person, there must be evidence of a personality. Dogs, frogs, and earthworms have all characteristics listed, but that is insufficient to make them persons Zindler 25). Another major pro-life concern is the medical hazards of an abortion. Pro-lifers believe that abortions have many negative physical and psychological effects. They say that even though abortion has been legalized, it remains a complicated procedure that can potentially harm a womans ability to bear normal, healthy babies in the future (Hilgers 152). The most common early complications of legally induced abortion are infection, hemorrhage, perfor ation of the uterus, and laceration of the cervix (Hilgers 153). There is also a pelvic inflammatory disease which can follow abortion, and happens up to 30 percent of the time (Lowenstein 44). Although the complications are physical, many pro-lifers say that the psychological effects are far more dangerous. They believe abortion has a particularly harmful effects on teenagers (Everyones Biography 1). The Medical College of Ohio studied how teenagers were able to cope with abortions as compared to adult women. They studied thirty-five women who had abortions as teenagers and thirty-six women who had abortions after age twenty. They found there were two factors present in teenage abortions. First, people other than the teenager had control of the abortion decision. Second, teenagers are less knowledgeable about the procedure and may have false ideas about it. Also, teenagers were less likely to consult a professional before making their decision. The study showed teenagers experienced greater stress during the abortion (Lowenstein 45). Pro-choicers strongly disagree on this matter. It is a proven fact that legal abortions are now medically safe and simple. Teenagers, for example, are 24 times more likely to die from childbirth than from a first-trimester abortion (Carlson 25). Death resulting from legal abortion is a very rare occurrence and easy to measure. In the first trimester, less that half of one percent of all abortion patients experience major complications (Jaffe, Lindheim, and Lee 150). Of course abortion involves some risk, but so do all medical procedures. According to the American Psychiatric Association report published in Science magazine in 1990, there are no significant psychological aftereffects of legal abortion. Legal abortion requested by the woman does not cause emotional problems or depression. Some women may feel sad or guilty at first, but not any more or less than any other personal crisis (Lowenstein 53). In particular, teenagers who had abortions seem to behave more normally than others who gave birth to a baby. Teenagers who have abortions are more likely to graduate high school, go to college, and get good jobs (Lowenstein 54). The third most controversial topic on abortions involves so-called hard cases such as rape and incest. The first point pro-lifers make is that the law allowing raped women to get abortions would only affect a few women, less than 1 percent of all abortions each year (Guernsey 68). Pro-life supporters believe the damage has already happened-that of the rape. An abortion will simply cause more psychological and physical harm. Even though half of the fetus if part of the rapist, half of the fetus is part of the woman, too. They believe it is unfair to kill a being who was not responsible for the rape (Lowenstein 47). Their feeling is the same for incest. In cases where abortion is chosen, pro-life activists believe an innocent baby is killed for a crime its father commits. The father, instead, should suffer. Pro-lifers believe if abortion is chosen, it helps to hide the fact that incest took place and it might continue(Lowenstein 48). Should abortion be allowed in cases of rape and incest? Absolutely yes, say pro-choicers. There may be serious psychological effects from having a child that was a result of a horrible experience like incest or rape. Pro-choice supporters believe if the woman decides to raise the child, they say, she will have a constant reminder of the incident (Lowenstein 55). Surveys have shown many people would accept abortion in cases of rape or incest (Women 2). Medical research has not determined whether there are genetic tendencies toward sexual crimes. The child may carry some of those genes (Lowenstein55). In summary, abortion is a personal choice. No should be able to tell a women whether or not to have a child. Therefore, keeping abortion legal will ensure that situations that involve crisis or health risks to the mother or the fetus can be handled safely and legally.

Pac Flaws free essay sample

Tragic figure Outpace was born in New York City, where he attended a prestigious Baltimore School of the Arts as a teenager that helped him launch his tragic career. Later on moved to Oakland California were the gangster rap started. He started out as a second-string rapper and dancer for Digital Underground, Joining only after they had already landed their biggest hit. . By 1994, OPAC rivaled Snoop Dog as the most controversial figure in rap, spending as much time in prison as he did in the cording studio. Shaker has become a legend in hip-hop and rap circles for his talent, his violent behavior, and his brutal death. Outpace Shaker to millions of people was either a poet, a MAC, a rapper, movie star or Just a public menace or figure; to me he was a tragic symbol. Although Outpace became wealthy and famous during the time he either live or wasnt in Jail, Outpace lived a tragic life. We will write a custom essay sample on Pac Flaws or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Like any other human Outpace had flaws.He mess to be living up to his aggressive gangster rap image with several arrests for violent offenses in the sasss. Outpace himself was a victim to violence, getting shot five times in the lobby of a recording studio during a mugging. As a rapper he never let anything let go he always had something to say back and the fans loved It, as he said himself, because of my big mouth. Outpace had become Involved In a feud between East Coast and West Coast rappers. He was known to Insult his enemies on his tracks.

Analysis of the Character of Winston in 1984 Essay Essays

Analysis of the Character of Winston in 1984 Essay Essays Analysis of the Character of Winston in 1984 Essay Essay Analysis of the Character of Winston in 1984 Essay Essay Essay Topic: 1984 Written by the writer George Orwell. 1984 gives a terrorizing mentality of society. George Orwell presents a universe in which society. controlled by the State. is indoctrinated in propaganda and semblance. The chief character is different from the remainder of the people since he decides to withstand the society he lives in. From the first chapters. the writer creates the image of an unsated adult male with the people environing him. The character of Winston. nevertheless. seems a spot of a paradox since. whilst he tries to arise against his society. he irrevocably loves his occupation. From the beginning of the book. Winston disobeys the Party’s orders ( by composing a journal ) . demoing his disapproval of the manner society is. Furthermore. the fact that Winston keeps a diary. witting of the danger he risks. is grounds that he hates his society. As the reader progresss in the first chapter. he can witness Winston’s attitude towards the Party’s values and the society. His attitude seems to ever differ from the other employees. Indeed during the â€Å"Two Minutes Hate† whilst everyone seems to abhor Goldstein. Winston is merely forging his hatred. This shows his refusal into following the Party’s regulations. Furthermore â€Å"Winston’s hatred was non turned against Goldstein but. on the contrary. against Large Brother. the Party and the Thought Police† . Winston has a really critical attack to the Party’s policies. Winston’s uneasiness towards the telescreen is farther cogent evidence on how he feels about society. Indeed. the telescreen represents another commanding facet of the society. Winston despises the commanding facet of his society since the telescreen has â€Å"pushed† him into going paranoiac. Winston’s attitude towards the telescreen shows us he hates his society for watching him all the clip. Winston besides hates adult females. a specific portion of society. They represent absolute obeisance and depersonalisation which he wholly disapproves of. Yet. his feelings towards them are presented as complex since Orwell insists on the fact that he looks down at them but besides feels attracted to them. Winston is nevertheless holding issues with pretty adult females: he feels that they are fall ining blindly the Party. His strong hatred for them is shown by the want to ache them: â€Å"flog to death† . â€Å"shoot arrows† . and â€Å"cut her pharynx at the climax†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ However his evident complicity with O’Brien shows. underneath all the hatred. that Winston is really hankering for a friend in this society he hates. This complicity is due to the fact that Winston feels closely to O’Brien as he defied Big Brother’s authorization. Winston might hold so felt like he was non the merely 1 to to the full contemn the universe he lives in. Winston’s hatred for is society has a self-contradictory facet since he reject his society’s values and deeply loves his occupation at the same clip. This seems self-contradictory because Winston despises the fact that the Party controls. modifies everything whilst his occupation consists in modifying paperss. His occupation consists in modifying paperss. as if he were rewriting History to do it consistent with the Party’s claims. Winston’s occupation requires organisation accomplishments. with particular attending for day of the months. The reader learns that â€Å"Winston’s greatest pleasance in life was in his work† . The benefits that his occupation brings to his life are get awaying his life and a place of power. The place of power might mention to the fact that Winston can alter elements of the universe he lives in and furthermore which might do Winston experience in complete control of his life and work. However. Winston is far from being â€Å"in control† of anything. but he does hold a certain sum of power at the Ministry. sing he is allowed to entree archives. This could explicate why Winston likes his occupation so much. Furthermore it seems that Winston is able to interact with the past and its â€Å"real† version being closer to world than the updated version. On the other manus. Winston expresses a sense of uncertainness refering the exact genuineness of the version he received. In add-on. it is because Winston hates his society he uses his occupation as a manner of burying his sad life. His occupation requires a batch of concentration and dedication. which is precisely what he needs to get away his deadening day-to-day modus operandi. Because he is so involved in his occupation. his life becomes easier. This means his occupation gives him the possibility of slightly get awaying from the horror of populating under such an government. 1984’s chief character Winston is a complex adult male. who refuses to conform to the norms of society and chooses alternatively to withstand it. while at the same clip he really much enjoys his work at the Ministry. Winston hates his society. yet loves his occupation. This is consistent because the facets of society that Winston so despises are mutable by his occupation.

The Weather Underground Essay Example

The Weather Underground Essay Example The Weather Underground Essay The Weather Underground Essay Essay Topic: Black Panther Film Name: Course: Instructor: Date: The Weather Underground The film, Weather Underground, is a 2002 documentary based on the American radical organization, The Weathermen. The film, based on real life events characterizing the American political system narrated the ascent and descent of the organization employing the use of archived footage from 1969. Directed by Bill Siegel and Sam Green, the documentary explored the lives of a few young people waging war against the United States Government, who would eventually be inaugurated from college activists to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s most wanted. Reactions to the film Centered on a political theme, the Weather Underground elicited various but profound reactions. At a time where the United States government was largely involved in the Vietnam War, most Americans were aware of the violence that escalated but could not do anything about the bloodshed. Negative rejoinders were centered on criticizing the group’s violent tactics oninnocent government officials asserting that the youth carried out politics that was misguided. Furthermore, negative reactions stemmed because of the revelries the youth engaged in at college such as sex and drugs asserting that the youth were idle and thus wanted action. However, some reactions praise the efforts of the Weathermen. Most of the reactions deem them as the pioneers of activism and American revolutionaries addressing the repressive tactics of the government to silence the discontentment of the American citizens. Political Views The main theme of the film was on politics. The documentary, though portraying the lives of the Weathermen in 1969, addressed the polarization of the political situation in America between the 1960s and the 1970s. The schism was becoming more acute characterized by the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement, which pressed the government. Such strong issues led to the creation of various youth political movements such as the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) who utilized peaceful protest methods to protest against the Vietnam War. The movements also protested against the role of the United States government in addressing racism because it was profound at that time, especially against the African American community. Furthermore, the movements criticizing the government eventually portrayed the dictatorial side of the government, which used law enforcement agencies such as the police to suppress the efforts of the activists. Storyline The documentary focuses on the lives of a group of college activists bent on addressing the government’s involvement in the Vietnam War and the repression of the Civil Rights Movement. Such issues led to the rise of youth movements who employed peaceful protest techniques to address the political issues. However, some factions of the movements found it ineffective to express peaceful dissent against the government. This notion eventually led to the separation of a group of college activists from the youth political movement, SDS, who advocated for the use of extremist approaches, which the government could not risk ignoring. The group, which would later become known as the Weathermen, joined together with another extremist group, The Black Panthers, and begun participating in street riots and even proceeded to bombing buildings and further planning to bomb government representatives. Eventually, the group became most wanted according to the FBI, undergoing violent suppression tactics and eventually being forced to go underground. The Weathermen will continue being emulated in America’s political history as the voice of a distressed nation. Presently, people are able to form movements that criticize the government without ear of suppression once they express dissent. Furthermore, the group indirectly raised awareness on the privileges and rights accorded by the United States Constitution such as the freedom of association, which at that time the government censored. Without such influential movements, activism and democracy would be devoid of the United States.

Feminism and International Security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Feminism and International Security - Essay Example In the face of increased security threats emanating from terror activities and techno wars, feminist voices have risen to demand for inclusion of women in international security systems. This study seeks to investigate the relationship between feminism and international security. This will be done by answering the question: what is the impact of feminism on international security? A comprehensive analysis of different literature on studies done on feminism and international security will be conducted so as to shed more light on this issue. (Blanchard 70-119), discusses the functions of feminist scholarship in international security by reviewing feminist literature on international relations. According to the study, feminists in the international relations have not put adequate focus on the issue of military hardware leading to scanty information on war, gender and technology understudied. The study also notes the importance of inclusion of women in security matters by analyzing the practical aspect of feminist security theory in the combating global insecurity. According to Blanchard, international relations; the body of discipline tasked with theorizing the world only created a place for feminist analysts just recently. This could be the reason behind the few female led academic studies and findings on topics relating to politics, military and war issues. The fact that foreign policy and military affairs have been mostly conducted by men, the academic discipline tasked with analyzing this two areas have become largel y masculine. The assumptions, explanations and experiences focus on men making it difficult for women to find scholarly materials on women experiences. According to (Pettman 19-56), historically women have played second fiddle to men in the decision making process on the global platform. Women have continually been rendered insecure through acts of sexual violence, gendered division of labour and